logo

Re·View Improves Patient Outcomes And Increases Radiologist Confidence

Share feature allows radiologists to optionally review other cases from the group

CONTACT US NOW
, Re·View

Re·View Outcome
Improvement Tool

LIMITED TIME OFFER! Save up to 30% off.
Offer ends May 31ˢᵗ

MagView provides many quality assurance tools to help radiologists and groups understand their performance based on medical self audit. Periodically auditing outcome measures can link practice patterns to patient outcomes in a way that can influence the interpreting physician’s behavior and performance in a positive way. However, several challenges can limit this process. It is often difficult for the radiologist to frequently review outcome measures, and observe them changing in response to changes in practice patterns. It is also sometimes difficult to understand each of the measures, and what corrective action should be associated with under performing measures. The Re·View Outcome Improvement Tool overcomes these challenges by providing the radiologist with real time access to relevant cases that they can learn from.

  • Share feature allows radiologists to optionally review other cases from the group
  • Blind review feature allows radiologists to predict, and then review the outcome
  • Optional integration with ACR RadPeer

CONTINUOUS FEEDBACK

Re·View provides each radiologist with a worklist of their own screening and diagnostic positive cases which have recently been followed up, and where the outcome is now known based on a diagnostic exam or biopsy result. The radiologist can review the initial imaging and report, then review the subsequent imaging or pathology result to critique the false positive or reinforce the true positive case. Re·View provides the radiologist with a source of continuous feedback from which they can improve their confidence when calling patients back,

Learning Modes

True Positive Callbacks

Allows the radiologist to review screening cases assessed BI-RADS category 0 after a diagnostic exam has recommended a biopsy, and after the biopsy has been performed.

False Positive Callbacks

Allows the radiologist to review screening cases assessed BI-RADS category 0 after a diagnostic exam has resulted in a BI-RADS 2 assessment

True Positive Biopsy Recommendations

 Allows the radiologist to review cases where a biopsy has been recommended, after a positive pathology report has been received.

False Positive Biopsy Recommendations

 Allows the radiologist to review cases where a biopsy has been recommended, after a negative pathology report has been received.

False Negatives

 Allows the radiologist to review cases where an interval cancer has been diagnosed following negative imaging. Using these tools for an extended time can help the radiologist improve their sensitivity and positive predictive value, and lower their recall rate if it is too high.